YouTube Channels Banned in Pakistan You Should Know

YouTube has become a powerful platform in Pakistan, especially for political commentary and news content. The algorithm promotes videos that attract high engagement, watch time, and prompt quick reactions, which often boosts bold or emotionally charged content.

Many Pakistani channels operate independently, without strict editorial checks. This creates space for diverse opinions but also increases the risk of spreading unverified or provocative material. The algorithm’s design can sometimes amplify such content, making regulation more complex.

Recently, 27 YouTube Channels Were Blocked

In June 2025, a local court in Islamabad ordered the blocking of 27 Pakistani YouTube channels. The decision was based on a petition filed by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA). The court found that these channels were allegedly spreading misleading, fake, and provocative content.

This action has triggered national attention. It also raised questions about digital freedom, online regulation, and the responsibility of content creators. This article explains what happened, why the channels were blocked, and what it means for Pakistan’s online space.

The Court’s Decision

On June 24, 2025, Judicial Magistrate Abbas Shah issued a written order. It directed YouTube’s officer-in-charge in Pakistan to block the mentioned channels. The court order came after the NCCIA presented an inquiry report. The report claimed that the 27 YouTube channels were:

• Spreading anti-state narratives

• Violating the privacy of state officials

• Sharing content that could provoke unrest

• Posting false and defamatory information

The court found the evidence sufficient to take legal action. It stated that the content posed a threat to public peace and state dignity.

Role of the NCCIA

The National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency is a federal body that investigates digital offenses. In this case, it launched an inquiry on June 2, 2025, following receipt of multiple complaints. The agency submitted video clips, transcripts, and screenshots. According to the NCCIA, the channels violated Pakistan’s electronic crime laws.

The agency also stated that the content was trying to:

• Defame state institutions

• Spread hate and division

• Undermine national unity

The complaint requested the court to direct Google LLC, YouTube’s parent company, to restrict access to these channels in Pakistan.

YouTube’s Response

While YouTube has not made a public statement, multiple affected content creators confirmed receiving emails from the platform. The email stated:

• YouTube received a legal removal request

• The request was linked to Court Enquiry No. 717/2025

• A copy of the court order was attached

The email also warned that if the channel owners did not take action, YouTube would comply with the court order without further notice. This is a standard practice. YouTube often blocks content locally in response to official legal notices. The platform adheres to the laws of the countries in which it operates.

List of Blocked YouTube Channels

According to the court order issued in June 2025, the 27 YouTube channels directed to be blocked include several well-known names from Pakistan’s digital and political circles. These channels are Haider Mehdi, Siddique Jaan, Sabee Kazmi, Orya Maqbool Jan, Arzoo Kazmi, Rana Uzair Speaks, Sajid Gondal, Habib Akram, Matiullah Jan MJtv, Asad Toor Uncensored, Imran Riaz Khan, Naya Pakistan, Sabir Shakir, Imran Khan, Aftab Iqbal, Real Entertainment TV, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Daily Qudrat, Abdul Qadir, Charsadda Journalist, Naila Pakistani Reaction, Wajahat Saeed Khan, Ahmad Noorani YouTube, Nazar Chohan YouTube, Moeed Pirzada YouTube, Makhdoom Shahab ud Din, and Shayan Ali YouTube. These include journalists, political commentators, independent creators, and channels linked to political parties.

Legal Framework

The action is based on Pakistan’s Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016. Under this law, authorities can request the removal of online content if it:

• Spreads false news

• Harms national security

• Promotes sectarianism or hate speech

• Violates the privacy and dignity of individuals

The NCCIA, being a legal authority, can present such cases in court. If a judge finds the complaint valid, digital platforms are legally required to comply.

Digital Rights vs. Regulation

This case has renewed debate over freedom of expression in Pakistan. Supporters of the decision argue that it protects state interests and maintains public order.

However, digital rights activists argue that such bans could harm free speech. They worry that the government might use these powers to silence critical voices and independent journalism.

Experts emphasize the importance of a balanced approach. They suggest that while harmful content should be regulated, clear criteria and transparency are essential.

Global Examples of Similar Actions

Pakistan is not alone in blocking YouTube channels. Many countries take similar steps by their national laws.

• India has blocked YouTube channels due to concerns over “fake news” and “national security.”

• Russia has ordered restrictions on content critical of the government

• Turkey regularly removes social media content based on court orders

• Germany takes down content involving hate speech or extremist ideologies

These actions show that digital content is under close watch globally. Each country has its own rules to control online spaces.

Possible Outcomes of the YouTube Channel Ban

The court-ordered ban on 27 YouTube channels in Pakistan is likely to have several short- and long-term consequences. These outcomes could affect not only the content creators involved but also the broader digital and legal landscape in the country. Below are the key developments that may follow:

YouTube Blocks Access in Pakistan

YouTube will likely comply with the court’s order by restricting access to the listed channels only within Pakistan. This means the blocked channels will remain available to international viewers unless they violate YouTube’s global policies. In such cases, the content or channel could be removed globally. However, if the court order is limited to Pakistan, YouTube generally uses geo-blocking technology to restrict local access. 

This is a common practice followed by platforms when responding to legal removal requests from governments or courts. The creators may not lose their entire channels but will lose access to their Pakistani audience, which for many is a significant source of views and engagement.

Content Creators May Appeal the Court’s Decision

Some of the affected YouTubers may challenge the court's decision by filing appeals in higher courts. Under Pakistan's legal system, individuals or organizations can contest lower court rulings if they believe their rights were violated or due process was not followed. 

These appeals could result in further legal reviews, potential suspension of the blocking orders, or even a reversal of the decision. However, court proceedings are time-consuming and require robust legal arguments, especially in cases involving national security or public interest. Whether these appeals will succeed depends on the evidence, legal interpretation, and public interest at stake.

Migration to Other Platforms

In response to the ban, many blocked creators may choose to shift their content to other social media platforms. These could include X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, or even alternative video platforms such as Dailymotion or Rumble. In previous cases where digital restrictions were enforced, creators used these alternative platforms to stay connected with their audiences. 

Some individuals may also utilize VPNs or mirror sites to circumvent regional restrictions, although these methods are not officially endorsed and may raise legal or ethical concerns. Regardless, the creators are likely to explore ways to continue their outreach and maintain their followers.

Rise in Public Discussion and Debate

The ban is expected to spark public debate about the future of digital freedom, journalism, and the government's role in regulating online speech. Viewers, legal experts, journalists, and civil society organizations may engage in debates over the boundaries of freedom of expression and responsible content creation. This could also lead to broader awareness about cyber laws, court powers, and the responsibilities of platforms like YouTube. 

Media watchdogs and human rights groups may issue statements or demand transparency and reforms. At the same time, the ban may prompt the government to introduce more straightforward guidelines for online content moderation in the future.

Responsible Content Creation

This incident highlights the importance of ethical digital journalism and fact-based reporting. With millions of YouTube users in Pakistan, online influence is stronger than ever. 

Content creators should:

• Verify facts before publishing

• Avoid inflammatory or baseless claims

• Respect individuals’ privacy

• Follow the platform and local laws

At the same time, viewers must

• Cross-check sources

• Think critically about what they watch

• Report harmful content responsibly

Final Thoughts

The blocking of 27 Pakistani YouTube channels in June 2025 is a significant moment for Pakistan’s digital landscape. While the government defends the move as a necessary legal step, many view it as a test of online freedom and media responsibility.

This development shows the growing importance of cyber laws, platform accountability, and responsible content creation. As the digital space evolves, a balance must be struck between free expression and regulation. Only time will tell how this action shapes the future of social media in Pakistan.

Read Also: Scheana Shay: Reality TV Star, Actress, and Modern Influencer